Working resource
The author adds a supplied draft.
Develop the instruction with its collaborators and relevant references.
Instruction authoring and review
Turn an AI draft into work instructions your team has reviewed
Bring the supplied draft into Resources, review it against the actual job with its author and reviewer, then publish instructions colleagues can use. SkillSmith keeps the discussion with the resource.
Make the task specific Review the working draft Publish for use
Roles, playbooks and a practical launch plan for your team.
Make the requested revision specific: add the correct-label example before publication.
Pay only when you see results
Agree the outcome for your first workflow with our team.
Trusted by leading organizations
“SkillSmith has always been very professional and responsive throughout the entire process and an absolute pleasure to work with.”
Paul HildebrandDirector of HSE/DOT, Jones Power
From draft to useful instruction
Make the instruction answer the real job
An AI draft can give an author a starting point. The useful work is deciding whether a colleague can follow it: what to compare, what counts as a match and who resolves an exception.
Connected work across your team
Bring a supplied draft through a useful review
Keep the working resource with its author and collaborators. Use a concrete job example to improve the content, then choose when the reviewed version is ready for its readers.
Instruction author
Start with the supplied text and the real task
Add the supplied draft to a working resource. In this example, the author brings a packing instruction and the actual order and label references so the reviewer can check what the person would do.
- A supplied draft
- The job and its intended reader
- The references used in the actual task
Author and experienced colleague
Put the missing comparison and exception into the text
Replace “check the order” with a comparison of the order reference and packing label. Add an example of a match. If they disagree, the instruction tells the colleague to hold the affected pack and ask the named lead.
- The reference to compare
- An example of the expected match
- The mismatch action and responsible contact
Named reviewer → author
Turn a vague comment into a concrete revision
The reviewer asks for an example of the correct label beside the instruction. The author adds the example and resolves the remaining question with the reviewer before choosing to publish the version.
- A task-specific review comment
- The author’s corrected text or example
- A clear decision about readiness to publish
SkillSmith
Resource owner → intended readers
Give readers the version your team is ready to use
Publish the reviewed version and set its intended audience. Working collaborators and published readers have distinct access. Link the instruction into the relevant prepared task so the colleague has its supporting material when doing the job.
- A deliberate publish decision
- The intended published audience
- The instruction linked to relevant work
SkillSmith
Connected information and agent support
Keep the draft, review and published use connected
Resources gives authors and collaborators a shared place to develop the instruction. Published access serves its readers, while prepared tasks carry the relevant instruction into the work.
Your work context
Your instruction material
Bring the supplied text and actual job references into a working resource.
Your author and reviewer
Record the specific concern and revise the instruction together.
Your published instruction
Give the intended readers the instruction beside their work.
We bring the relevant
context into your work
ReviewPublish
Resources
Reviewed instruction
- Working draft
- Review comments
- Published access
Keep collaboration and reader access distinct
Review comments
The reviewer identifies a missing job detail.
Keep the requested revision beside the instruction.
Published resource
The owner publishes the reviewed version.
Set its audience and use it as supporting material in prepared work.
Keep the conversation moving
Download our instruction-review product sheet
Share the draft-to-reviewed-instruction example with your authors and reviewers.
- A concrete draft and corrected instruction
- Working review and published use
- Roles, launch steps and a useful demo
PDF · 6 pages
Our delivery approach
Start with an instruction your team needs to improve
Bring a supplied draft and someone who knows the actual job. We’ll help your team try a practical review and publication method around that instruction.
- 01
Choose the draft and job
Select one instruction with a clear reader and work setting. Gather the actual references and an example that exposes an unclear step.
What we prepare togetherA useful review scope tied to the real task.
- 02
Work through the correction
Invite the author and relevant reviewers. Make the missing comparison, expected result and exception explicit in the working resource.
What we prepare togetherA revised instruction with specific review questions resolved.
- 03
Publish and check the first use
Choose the intended audience and publish the version. Follow a colleague’s first use and capture any question that should improve the next revision.
What we prepare togetherA published instruction and an owned next improvement.
Talk with our team
We are here to help
Bring us the work your team wants to improve. We’ll walk through your instructions, responsibilities and review criteria, then show how our platform can support that work.
Keep your authoring work and improve the review
We help organize the draft, collaborators and intended readers around one real instruction. The author and reviewer make the substantive decisions about what the job requires.
Your existing draftBring the material you have already written or obtained.
Your team’s job knowledgeUse experienced colleagues to check the reference, decision and exception.
Your publication choicePublish when the owner is ready to make the reviewed version available.
Rohit Singh
VP of Strategic Partnerships
Connecting your workflows with the systems and partners you rely on.
Brent Jackson
Director of Customer Success
Helping your team turn procedures into practical learning and task completion.
Your questions
Practical questions about reviewing an AI draft
What should we bring?
Bring the supplied draft, the actual task and the references a colleague will use. An order and label example makes a packing instruction easier to review than fluent wording alone.
What should the reviewer change?
Look for missing job decisions: what to compare, what an acceptable result looks like and what to do when it differs. Make the correction specific enough for the author to revise the instruction.
Who works on the draft?
Invite the people who need to write or review the working resource. Set published access for the people who need to use the finished version. A colleague can have both responsibilities when the work calls for it.
When is the instruction ready to publish?
The owner publishes after the author and reviewer resolve the task-specific questions. Check that the expected result, exception and responsible contact are clear, then follow the first use for anything the next revision should improve.